Skip to content

next (5.3 do not merge) #3074

Open
csviri wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
next
Open

next (5.3 do not merge) #3074
csviri wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
next

Conversation

@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from metacosm and xstefank December 1, 2025 10:17
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 15, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 15, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 25, 2026
csviri and others added 17 commits February 4, 2026 15:30
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
simplified the javadoc

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
- Adds utility that provides methods to update resources using comparable resource versions
- Integrates this utility to the core of the framework (thus simplifying `ReconciliationDispatcher`)
  -  note that this introduces a change in the behavior for the `UpdateControl.patchStatus` (and others), since it won't trigger the reconiliation for the event in that update.
-  Renames former `ReconcilerUtils` to `ReconcilerUtilsInternal`, this is breaking but that utils was never advertised for non-internal usage 
- Includes also fixes for ControllerEventSource event filtering
- Improves TemporaryResourceCache event filtering algorithm

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkins <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Steve Hawkins <[email protected]>
This should not be user facing. At least not in any obvious scenerio.

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
…om Context (#3142)

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants